Feb. 17 – Thoughts on Lev. 21-22 & Matt. 28

Matthew ends his gospel with what has commonly been called The Great Commission.  Matthew has continually shown Jesus to be the fulfillment of all of the Old Testament Messianic prophecies, until the resurrection.  Here everything changes and with that change nature resounds.  As the Marys sit at the tomb the earth is shaken, lightning struck in the form of an angel, and terror froze the guards.  And with that cataclysm, the world was changed.

In the Old Testament, faith revolved around the temple with a centripetal force.  The belief was that everything moved in toward the center of the faith, the Temple, like a giant whirlpool.  People had to come from far away to Jerusalem to experience God.  But with the Resurrection, the tides of the world reversed.  No longer did the Temple draw people toward the center like a whirlpool.  Now the New Temple, Jesus Himself, sent people out from the center with a centrifugal force unmatched in all of history.  Rather than pulling people in to meet with God, Jesus now sent people out, filled with God’s Holy Spirit, so people could interact with God “out there”.   No longer were the walls of the temple and the culture built to keep people at a holy distance from God, but now those walls crumbled as God went out to build a holy intimacy with everyone.

And so this Great Commission begins with the word, “Go.”  “Go into all the world and make disciples, followers, of all nations.”  Don’t kick out the scribes and Pharisees and teach new things in their place in the Temple courts, but instead Go and share the good news of grace found in Jesus Christ.  Go, and baptize them into a new relationship with God and with His people.  Go and teach them what I taught you, not as a set of rules but as a means to get to know this God who created you.  Go with God, even to the end of the age.

/0 Comments/by

Feb. 16 – Thoughts on Lev. 19-20 & Matt. 27:51-66

Almost all of the struggles in churches and even denominations today revolve around this question:  Which commands in scripture are we to follow and which are we not to follow?  As a “people of the book”, this may seem a strange question.  Of course, we are to follow all of the bible’s commands.  They come from God and He never changes, so His Word must never change as well.  But while God never changes, and His word never changes either, we do.  And the world does.

Because of this, some commands are typically agreed to be culturally or time bound.  Few think, for instance, that wearing fabric made of two different materials is sinful, or trimming your beard.  In fact, while some claim to be “biblical literalists who follow the whole of scripture”, every one of us draws a line through the scriptures, dividing the timeless truths from the ones we no longer need to follow.  Are arguments come when we disagree where that line falls.

And where that line falls is not clear, or we probably wouldn’t be arguing about it.  We can’t divide by chapter* nor by book.  So how do we decide?  Are we going against God’s will when we reap all of our fields instead of leaving the edges for the poor (19:9)?  Or when we pay our workers monthly instead of daily (19:13)?  Or when we steal or lie (19:11)?  How many and which of yesterday’s laws about sexual relations are applicable today?

Decisions like this require wisdom, and wisdom comes from God.  So before we begin deciding which verses we’ll hold ourselves to, we need to know the whole of scripture (so read your bible all the way through at some point) and we need to approach it with prayer for wisdom.  Then we let God inform us, guide us, and teach us.

 

*remember that all chapter and verse markings came hundreds of years after the bible was written, created as a helpful study guide by humans, and therefore not divinely given.

/0 Comments/by

Feb. 16 – Thoughts on Lev. 19-20 & Matt. 27:51-66

Almost all of the struggles in churches and even denominations today revolve around this question:  Which commands in scripture are we to follow and which are we not to follow?  As a “people of the book”, this may seem a strange question.  Of course, we are to follow all of the bible’s commands.  They come from God and He never changes, so His Word must never change as well.  But while God never changes, and His word never changes either, we do.  And the world does.

Because of this, some commands are typically agreed to be culturally or time bound.  Few think, for instance, that wearing fabric made of two different materials is sinful, or trimming your beard.  In fact, while some claim to be “biblical literalists who follow the whole of scripture”, every one of us draws a line through the scriptures, dividing the timeless truths from the ones we no longer need to follow.  Are arguments come when we disagree where that line falls.

And where that line falls is not clear, or we probably wouldn’t be arguing about it.  We can’t divide by chapter* nor by book.  So how do we decide?  Are we going against God’s will when we reap all of our fields instead of leaving the edges for the poor (19:9)?  Or when we pay our workers monthly instead of daily (19:13)?  Or when we steal or lie (19:11)?  How many and which of yesterday’s laws about sexual relations are applicable today?

Decisions like this require wisdom, and wisdom comes from God.  So before we begin deciding which verses we’ll hold ourselves to, we need to know the whole of scripture (so read your bible all the way through at some point) and we need to approach it with prayer for wisdom.  Then we let God inform us, guide us, and teach us.

 

*remember that all chapter and verse markings came hundreds of years after the bible was written, created as a helpful study guide by humans, and therefore not divinely given.

/0 Comments/by

Feb. 15 – Thoughts on Lev. 17-18 & Matt. 27:27-50

Today we read one of the first of the “clobber verses” in the discussion around homosexuality and the bible.  These clobber verses have been used to attack and bloody the LGBTQ community throughout history.  God did not give us His Word to be used as a club against others and must be deeply disappointed in those who do.

This section on “unlawful sexual relations” is an interesting one for a number of reasons.  It begins with a summary – don’t have sex with a close relation.  Speaking only to the men in it’s patriarchal society, the point seems to be holiness, separation from the society around them in terms of sexual behavior.  It goes on to list the people one must avoid sexually, including moms, daughters, aunts, granddaughters, and others.  Then a similar theme comes, sexual relations during a woman’s period.  Since blood was unclean, this makes sense.

Suddenly, it forbids child sacrifice.  This seems almost a non-sequiter.  But then a forbidding of homosexual activity and bestiality finish off the section.  One final statement of the purpose of these prohibitions – to remain separate from the nations around you – ends the chapter.

None of these prohibitions have been either allowed or ignored since this was written.  We still forbid close sexual relations, child sacrifice, and bestiality.  So the “Old Testament is irrelevant” argument doesn’t apply here, though it may elsewhere.  Yet we seem to have ignored the most important part of this whole chapter: holiness.  We really don’t put much import at all on being noticeably different from the nations around us.  In fact, many tout the value of being like the people at our work, school, or neighborhood in terms of evangelism.

Is it ok for us to proclaim the importance of holding to these individual laws while virtually ignoring the whole point of those laws?  Is it appropriate for us to blend in to the society around us, or should we still be attempting to be noticeably different or separate – in a word, holy – from the people around us?  Is it more important to be accepted by our schoolmates or workmates, or to stand out as a Christian?

/0 Comments/by

Feb. 15 – Thoughts on Lev. 17-18 & Matt. 27:27-50

Today we read one of the first of the “clobber verses” in the discussion around homosexuality and the bible.  These clobber verses have been used to attack and bloody the LGBTQ community throughout history.  God did not give us His Word to be used as a club against others and must be deeply disappointed in those who do.

This section on “unlawful sexual relations” is an interesting one for a number of reasons.  It begins with a summary – don’t have sex with a close relation.  Speaking only to the men in it’s patriarchal society, the point seems to be holiness, separation from the society around them in terms of sexual behavior.  It goes on to list the people one must avoid sexually, including moms, daughters, aunts, granddaughters, and others.  Then a similar theme comes, sexual relations during a woman’s period.  Since blood was unclean, this makes sense.

Suddenly, it forbids child sacrifice.  This seems almost a non-sequiter.  But then a forbidding of homosexual activity and bestiality finish off the section.  One final statement of the purpose of these prohibitions – to remain separate from the nations around you – ends the chapter.

None of these prohibitions have been either allowed or ignored since this was written.  We still forbid close sexual relations, child sacrifice, and bestiality.  So the “Old Testament is irrelevant” argument doesn’t apply here, though it may elsewhere.  Yet we seem to have ignored the most important part of this whole chapter: holiness.  We really don’t put much import at all on being noticeably different from the nations around us.  In fact, many tout the value of being like the people at our work, school, or neighborhood in terms of evangelism.

Is it ok for us to proclaim the importance of holding to these individual laws while virtually ignoring the whole point of those laws?  Is it appropriate for us to blend in to the society around us, or should we still be attempting to be noticeably different or separate – in a word, holy – from the people around us?  Is it more important to be accepted by our schoolmates or workmates, or to stand out as a Christian?

/0 Comments/by