The Song of Solomon is one of the oddest books to be included in the bible.  From the fact that to this day we can’t agree on a name (“Song of Solomon?”  “Song of Songs?” or even “Canticle of Canticles?”), to the fact that it is hard to find any teaching about God in it, this book is often ignored in preaching, bible studies, and discussion.  So we have to ask why it is in there at all.

Many have posited that it is a rather risque description of the deep love we have for God and that God has for us.  We collectively are the “she” of these verses and God is the “he”.  But even this feels forced, like we’re trying to Christianize (though being OT, it’s probably more accurate to say, “Yahweh-ize”) a Jewish love letter.

Many find it hard to preach this text due to its “PG-13” elements, frank discussion of lovers in love, and romanticism of our holy relationship with God.  But in reality, I believe that it is simply hard to find moral lessons in this book, and without a moral, it is neither parable, proverb, nor teachable poem.  So how does one preach it to a congregation looking for one more moral lesson to work on through the week?

The truth is, I don’t know.  But I do love things that shake up our traditional, staid and stoic view of God and faith, so we’re going to talk about it in the days to come, learn what we may.

The Song of Solomon is one of the oddest books to be included in the bible.  From the fact that to this day we can’t agree on a name (“Song of Solomon?”  “Song of Songs?” or even “Canticle of Canticles?”), to the fact that it is hard to find any teaching about God in it, this book is often ignored in preaching, bible studies, and discussion.  So we have to ask why it is in there at all.

Many have posited that it is a rather risque description of the deep love we have for God and that God has for us.  We collectively are the “she” of these verses and God is the “he”.  But even this feels forced, like we’re trying to Christianize (though being OT, it’s probably more accurate to say, “Yahweh-ize”) a Jewish love letter.

Many find it hard to preach this text due to its “PG-13” elements, frank discussion of lovers in love, and romanticism of our holy relationship with God.  But in reality, I believe that it is simply hard to find moral lessons in this book, and without a moral, it is neither parable, proverb, nor teachable poem.  So how does one preach it to a congregation looking for one more moral lesson to work on through the week?

The truth is, I don’t know.  But I do love things that shake up our traditional, staid and stoic view of God and faith, so we’re going to talk about it in the days to come, learn what we may.

10 Am I now trying to win the approval of human beings, or of God? Or am I trying to please people? If I were still trying to please people, I would not be a servant of Christ.

After Paul was called by Jesus Himself on the road to Damascus, he began his ministry by traveling to a number of churches in an area called Galatia.  This was just north and west of Antioch, his home base and sending church.  After traveling this route, Paul returned to Antioch to share his ministry and at some point wrote a letter back to these churches.  This letter is our book of Galatians.

As Paul begins his letter to the Galatian churches, he spends a lot of time defending himself from the complaint that he just made up this gospel he preached to win the favor of the people around him.  This complaint came from Jews who followed him from church to church, city to city.  Once he left a place, these Jews came in and began unraveling his teaching, his reputation, and even his gospel.  So in his letter back to the churches, he has to begin by defending his ministry.

In doing so, he states that pleasing people is in direct contradiction to being a servant of Christ.  I hear this touted regularly yet have not met a pastor who didn’t wrestle with this reality.  For younger pastors, it is often a matter of standing in the congregation or popularity.  While we all like people to say nice things about us, as we age we come to see that these things are pretty meaningless, to use Solomon’s phrase.  For older pastors, it is far more often about keeping a job since most churches are looking for younger pastors and jobs for 50+ year old pastors are hard to come by.

Would that we could all be like Paul, traveling and planting churches and bound to no individual church but rather to the goodness of The Church.  It would free us to preach the truth without fear of reprisal because we are too progressive, too conservative, too boring, or not a Leader.  Yet who of us has the faith to face all Paul faced in his ministry?  Lord, may we trust you more.

10 Am I now trying to win the approval of human beings, or of God? Or am I trying to please people? If I were still trying to please people, I would not be a servant of Christ.

After Paul was called by Jesus Himself on the road to Damascus, he began his ministry by traveling to a number of churches in an area called Galatia.  This was just north and west of Antioch, his home base and sending church.  After traveling this route, Paul returned to Antioch to share his ministry and at some point wrote a letter back to these churches.  This letter is our book of Galatians.

As Paul begins his letter to the Galatian churches, he spends a lot of time defending himself from the complaint that he just made up this gospel he preached to win the favor of the people around him.  This complaint came from Jews who followed him from church to church, city to city.  Once he left a place, these Jews came in and began unraveling his teaching, his reputation, and even his gospel.  So in his letter back to the churches, he has to begin by defending his ministry.

In doing so, he states that pleasing people is in direct contradiction to being a servant of Christ.  I hear this touted regularly yet have not met a pastor who didn’t wrestle with this reality.  For younger pastors, it is often a matter of standing in the congregation or popularity.  While we all like people to say nice things about us, as we age we come to see that these things are pretty meaningless, to use Solomon’s phrase.  For older pastors, it is far more often about keeping a job since most churches are looking for younger pastors and jobs for 50+ year old pastors are hard to come by.

Would that we could all be like Paul, traveling and planting churches and bound to no individual church but rather to the goodness of The Church.  It would free us to preach the truth without fear of reprisal because we are too progressive, too conservative, too boring, or not a Leader.  Yet who of us has the faith to face all Paul faced in his ministry?  Lord, may we trust you more.

The Theology of Suffering is something few preach about because it is not a very popular topic.  However, anyone who does finds an audience ready for the message because it is the reality of life.  A theology that shuns suffering is a theology that looks good on paper and in sermons but doesn’t resonate with the reality of life.  For to quote a popular movie of my day, “Life is pain, highness.  Anyone who tells you differently is selling you something.”

We love comfort and hope and optimism and good news.  But life gives us too much suffering for these to be anything but vapor, a chasing after the wind.  Sure there are good times in life, and we who are wealthy have more than our fair share of them.  But then we are struck with a sickness we didn’t earn, or a financial or family crisis we couldn’t have seen coming.  And suddenly our secretly works-based theology doesn’t work.  “What did I do to deserve this?” we ask.  “If I’d just been a better person, or not lied or cheated or stolen or killed, or if I had just earned a better lot in life.”  The first blessing of suffering is that it reveals the falseness of a works-based theology.  Today’s Proverbs tell us that bad people have good luck, and good people have bad luck, and things are inherently unfair when seen through a works-based, “getting what we deserve” theology.  Our only hope of clinging to this kind of thinking is to believe that we are so terrible that we deserve every bad thing that happens, and that any good thing that happens is just grace, or mercy, or luck.  Suffering strips away the falseness of a works-based theology.

Suffering also forces us to choose between God and anything else.  When cancer strikes, where will you turn, for healing or comfort?  When our kids leave the faith, where will we go for hope?  When we are oppressed by an unjust system that targets us and holds us down, where will we find justice?  Will we turn to our own protests or wisdom or power?  Will we turn to the powers of this world, whether political or popular?  Or will we turn to God?  The gospel by definition saves us, which is why it is so hard to be comfortable and “on fire for the gospel”, because without suffering we have little if anything to be saved from.

We need suffering to keep us humble, honest with our beliefs, and clinging to God in fear, or in anger, or in hope.  Suffering is not meaningless, but most other things in life are.