The Rapture has fascinated Christian imaginations since the late 1800’s when an Australian pastor developed the idea.  The thought is that at some point in time, God will take all the good people up to heaven while the bad people will remain on earth as it falls to ruin, prey for the myriad apocalyptic disasters mentioned (or even hinted at) in the rest of the bible.

Today’s New Testament passage is one of the foundational texts for this particular line of thought.  “Two will be in their field: one will be taken and one left behind.”  In fact, Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins named their 16-book premillennial series “Left Behind” after this very verse.

But one large problem is never mentioned by those promoting a Rapture theology.  In the verse before, Jesus sets up this passage by talking about Noah and the flood.  Did you notice how Jesus framed it?  …the flood came and took them all away.”  Who was taken away?  Not Noah and his family, but the wicked of the world.  Noah and his family were the ones left behind.  So with Jesus’ own words the whole thought falls apart.

Add to this the other passages they quote from Revelation and we see the whole Rapture collapsing for lack of a foundation.  Revelation, rather than talking about God taking His people away, speaks of the redemption of this world that sin has taken hostage.  God will redeem this world, creating a New Heaven and a New Earth with a New Jerusalem coming down out of the sky, a symbol of redemption and resurrection.

So before we write off this world as a lost cause that is just going to burn up anyway, let’s re-read our apocalyptic literature throughout the scripture and realize that God’s call is always to redemption, to making right what sin has made wrong, of re-creation.  And we get to join Him in that work!  Hallelujah!

The Rapture has fascinated Christian imaginations since the late 1800’s when an Australian pastor developed the idea.  The thought is that at some point in time, God will take all the good people up to heaven while the bad people will remain on earth as it falls to ruin, prey for the myriad apocalyptic disasters mentioned (or even hinted at) in the rest of the bible.

Today’s New Testament passage is one of the foundational texts for this particular line of thought.  “Two will be in their field: one will be taken and one left behind.”  In fact, Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins named their 16-book premillennial series “Left Behind” after this very verse.

But one large problem is never mentioned by those promoting a Rapture theology.  In the verse before, Jesus sets up this passage by talking about Noah and the flood.  Did you notice how Jesus framed it?  …the flood came and took them all away.”  Who was taken away?  Not Noah and his family, but the wicked of the world.  Noah and his family were the ones left behind.  So with Jesus’ own words the whole thought falls apart.

Add to this the other passages they quote from Revelation and we see the whole Rapture collapsing for lack of a foundation.  Revelation, rather than talking about God taking His people away, speaks of the redemption of this world that sin has taken hostage.  God will redeem this world, creating a New Heaven and a New Earth with a New Jerusalem coming down out of the sky, a symbol of redemption and resurrection.

So before we write off this world as a lost cause that is just going to burn up anyway, let’s re-read our apocalyptic literature throughout the scripture and realize that God’s call is always to redemption, to making right what sin has made wrong, of re-creation.  And we get to join Him in that work!  Hallelujah!

The Pharisees are the only group Jesus ever treated as enemies.  Tax collectors, zealots for Israel, fishermen, prostitutes, widows, lepers, the lame, Roman soldiers… all of these He treated with respect and even friendship.  But the teachers of the law, the scribes, and the Pharisees received nothing but wrath on a collective basis.  Yesterday and today, we’ve read about the primary issues Jesus has with them.

Hypocrisy – acting one way while living another.  Jesus’ focus on the inward motive, emotion, and beliefs rather than the outward actions stood directly against the teaching of the Pharisees who focused almost solely on the externals.  This led Jesus to regularly call them hypocrites, literally “actors” who are playing a part different from who they really are.

Reputation – seeking the acclaim of others.  Everything they do, from the way they dress to the way they speak to the titles they require, are for human praise rather than God’s.

Seeking converts rather than disciples – Alan Hirsch, speaking at the Midwinter Conference, said that when we begin with a false foundation of faith, then the more devout we are to that foundation, the further away from the Truth we are.  It would be better to be an atheist than devoted to a wrong foundational belief.  The Pharisees are not only devoted to a wrong foundation, they are seeking converts to that same set of faulty beliefs.

Worldliness – they claim money is more important than worship, financial stewardship is more important than stewardship of their talents and time, and that anyone who disagreed with them is a false prophet and should be beaten or even killed.

And so Jesus proclaims that however pretty their external behavior, their inside is unclean, dead, and filled with greed and self-indulgence.

“Humans judge others by their behaviors, but judge themselves by their intentions.”  As uncomfortable as this chapter may be to read, it is an important call to evaluate your inner life, your attitudes toward others, and your motivations rather than your intentions or even your outward behavior.

The Pharisees are the only group Jesus ever treated as enemies.  Tax collectors, zealots for Israel, fishermen, prostitutes, widows, lepers, the lame, Roman soldiers… all of these He treated with respect and even friendship.  But the teachers of the law, the scribes, and the Pharisees received nothing but wrath on a collective basis.  Yesterday and today, we’ve read about the primary issues Jesus has with them.

Hypocrisy – acting one way while living another.  Jesus’ focus on the inward motive, emotion, and beliefs rather than the outward actions stood directly against the teaching of the Pharisees who focused almost solely on the externals.  This led Jesus to regularly call them hypocrites, literally “actors” who are playing a part different from who they really are.

Reputation – seeking the acclaim of others.  Everything they do, from the way they dress to the way they speak to the titles they require, are for human praise rather than God’s.

Seeking converts rather than disciples – Alan Hirsch, speaking at the Midwinter Conference, said that when we begin with a false foundation of faith, then the more devout we are to that foundation, the further away from the Truth we are.  It would be better to be an atheist than devoted to a wrong foundational belief.  The Pharisees are not only devoted to a wrong foundation, they are seeking converts to that same set of faulty beliefs.

Worldliness – they claim money is more important than worship, financial stewardship is more important than stewardship of their talents and time, and that anyone who disagreed with them is a false prophet and should be beaten or even killed.

And so Jesus proclaims that however pretty their external behavior, their inside is unclean, dead, and filled with greed and self-indulgence.

“Humans judge others by their behaviors, but judge themselves by their intentions.”  As uncomfortable as this chapter may be to read, it is an important call to evaluate your inner life, your attitudes toward others, and your motivations rather than your intentions or even your outward behavior.

What would a church do if they received significantly more than they had budgeted for by October?  What if they exceeded their budget by $100,000 on October 5th?  Would that church put out a call to the congregation to stop giving?  In the same way that we send letters near year’s end asking for an increase in giving, would that church send a letter declining any further gifts?  “God has given us our budget plus way more so we’d like you to keep your money and stop giving to the church for now.”  I don’t think so.

In Ex. 36:6, the people had been so generous in their giving that the leadership had to stop them from giving more.  They had made and then given so much for the mission they were accomplishing (building the Tabernacle) that they didn’t have need or even room for more.

In our culture of “more”, we are never going to turn down giving.  We can never have too much – we can always use more.  But are we asking people to give toward a ministry with a set cost or are we simply asking them to give to God?  These are two very different purposes for giving and both hold to a different view of God.

If we are giving to a budget, then we begin thinking that God needs us and our money.  We begin to think about the power our giving gives us, and linking the amount we give to the amount we should be receiving.  If, on the other hand, we are giving to God regardless of budget, then our giving is a thanksgiving practice, a matter of worship, and about what God has given us, not what we can give to God.

Jesus talked about money more than any other aspect of life besides loving, so it’s worthwhile for us to contemplate our own giving.  Why do you give what you give to church?  What is the attitude, the worldview, and the Godview behind your giving?